MetaMask Card
MetaMask Card is relevant because of the brand, but it is still more Web3 niche than mass-market product.
- Score
- 4.0 / 5
- KYC
- KYC required
- Type
- Self-Custody
Card vs card comparison
MetaMask Card ranks slightly ahead of WhiteBIT Nova overall. The better choice depends on card type, KYC requirements, real fees and whether you prioritize cashback, self-custody or everyday usability.
MetaMask Card is relevant because of the brand, but it is still more Web3 niche than mass-market product.
WhiteBIT Nova is relevant as an exchange card, but less established than Crypto.com, Nexo or Bitpanda.
| Criterion | MetaMask Card | WhiteBIT Nova |
|---|---|---|
| Rating | 4.0 / 5 | 3.5 / 5 |
| Card type | Self-Custody | Debit |
| KYC | KYC required | KYC required |
| Fee score | 3.7 / 5 | 3.3 / 5 |
| Cashback | 1% possible | Campaign/program dependent |
| Availability | Selected countries | Europe, depending on country |
| Network | Mastercard | Visa |
| Self-custody | Yes | No |
| Apple Pay | Yes | Yes |
| Google Pay | Yes | Yes |
| Risk score | 3.9 / 5 | 3.4 / 5 |
MetaMask Card: Check fees during card setup
WhiteBIT Nova: Check fees and cashback in the Nova program
MetaMask Card: 1% possible
WhiteBIT Nova: Campaign/program dependent
MetaMask Card: Wallet responsibility, smart-account setup and country availability must be understood.
WhiteBIT Nova: Confirm country availability and fees before recommending.
MetaMask Card ranks slightly ahead of WhiteBIT Nova overall. The better choice depends on card type, KYC requirements, real fees and whether you prioritize cashback, self-custody or everyday usability.
MetaMask Card ranks slightly ahead of WhiteBIT Nova overall. The better choice depends on card type, KYC requirements, real fees and whether you prioritize cashback, self-custody or everyday usability.
Both cards have a similar KYC category: MetaMask Card: KYC required, WhiteBIT Nova: KYC required.
For beginners, simple fees, clear availability and support matter more than maximum rewards.